Colorado cannabis sales tank in 2022 after pandemic-induced high (copy)

FILE PHOTO: Assistant cultivator Saul Servin writes down the weight of a “Mac” strain marijuana plant while harvesting at the Euflora cannabis greenhouse on Tuesday, March 1, 2022, in Denver, Colo. (Timothy Hurst/The Denver Gazette)

Aurora councilmembers shot down a proposal at Monday night's study session to get rid of the excise tax on marijuana cultivation in the city, saying the city relies on the tax money to pay for road work and debt.

In Colorado, on top of regular sales tax rates, the marijuana industry pays an excise tax for wholesale marijuana — or marijuana before it is sold to customers — and a special sales tax on retail cannabis sales.

In Aurora, this excise tax is 5% and has been since voters approved it in 2014. If the tax is repealed, the city would lose up to $686,600 annually, according to agenda documents. 

Councilmember Curtis Gardner made the proposal, saying he disagrees with the tax targeting only marijuana businesses and that the removal of the tax would likely incentivize businesses to come to Aurora.

"I'm frankly not a believer in targeting specific industries for additional taxes," Gardner said. "We don't treat (marijuana) like alcohol, we don't treat it like cigarettes, we don't treat it like really any other product that is somewhat similar. We regulate it much further than we do those products."

Aurora is not the only municipality discussing the tax.

Pueblo councilmembers decided in a December meeting to suspend the marijuana excise tax, bringing it from 8% to 0% for three years starting Jan. 1. Denver also has a 0% excise tax rate for marijuana cultivation along with several other Colorado cities including Fort Collins, Lakewood and Durango.

"It would put us on par with some other municipalities to make us a lot more competitive here in the metro area," Gardner said.

In terms of making up for that revenue, Gardner said he is working with the budget office on a "couple of different scenarios."

He is also having conversations with the Marijuana Enforcement Division about additional ways the city can reduce the regulatory burden to offset some of the cost, he said. 

Currently, the money from the excise tax goes toward debt for the city's Central and Southeast Recreation Centers, which adds up to $4 million, as well as to road maintenance, with current projects adding up to $6 million, according to City Manager Jason Batchelor.

Councilmember Francoise Bergan expressed concern about losing revenue for those things by removing the tax.

Once removed, the tax would have to be brought back to voters if the council wanted to put it back in place. 

Councilmember Alison Coombs echoed Bergan's statement, saying she is concerned that they do not have exact numbers showing the city could make up the money through other means and that the city wouldn't be able to bring the tax back easily if they found they couldn't make the money in other ways.

"We've had conversations about hypothetical offsets, if we see that those actually offset the cost, then I think we can have the conversation about cutting the tax," Coombs said. "Until we actually have numbers ... I don't think it's responsible to be bringing this forward."

Mayor Mike Coffman said the excise tax isn't the thing impeding the industry, but rather the federal regulation of marijuana.

Coffman said he would be happy to move forward with a resolution urging the Biden administration to expedite the process of moving marijuana from schedule one to schedule three, but did not support the removal of the excise tax given its contributions to the city's needs.

Currently the marijuana industry, in addition to paying extra in taxes, is also not allowed to take normal business tax deductions for things they spend money on, such as rent and employee salaries.

The executive director of the Marijuana Industry Group, Truman Bradley, has come to prior council meetings to talk about the impact the costs have on marijuana businesses. Taxes have gone up roughly twice as quickly as sales, he said at a prior council meeting. 

For a coffee shop business, for example, if the business brings in $1 million but spent $500,000 on business expenses, their taxable income is $500,000, Bradley said in a previous council meeting. For a marijuana business making and spending those same amounts, the business would be taxed on the entire $1 million.

Sales tax rates on cannabis businesses have been a long-debated issue in Aurora. In a council study session late last year, Mayor Pro Tem Curtis Gardner said "I told you so" to other city council members after hearing a presentation from the city's budget office and an outside cannabis organization about the negative impacts of increased sales tax on the industry.

Statewide, total marijuana sales are down significantly. According to the Colorado Department of Revenue, total cannabis sales plunged to $137.3 million in July of 2023 from the pandemic level high of $207.1 million set in March 2021.

Newsletters

Get OutThere

Signup today for free and be the first to get notified on new updates.

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.