Nearly two years after the U.S. Forest Service wrapped up much-debated trail reroutes in the Bear Creek watershed in Colorado Springs’ southwestern mountains, the agency is under fire once again, with the Center for Biological Diversity threatening lawsuit over what it sees as “ongoing failures” to protect the home of greenback cutthroat trout.
The center’s lawsuit in 2012 prompted the lengthy initiative, which ended with stakeholders in 2017 receiving a government award for “collaborative/integrated aquatic stewardship.”
But now, with the dust thought to be settled in the popular recreation area known as Jones Park, the center deems landowners are again in violation of the Endangered Species Act.
“Specifically, the Forest has failed to abide by its own Proposed Action to relocate motorized Trail 667 out of Bear Creek’s Water Influence Zone,” reads the letter of intent to sue.
Trail users could be kicking down sediment, the center fears, causing pile-up in the stream and smothering trout eggs and emerging fry.
Forest Service officials did not return a request for comment. Though the letter was not addressed to El Paso County, the local agency was conveyed the land following the project and “there is still threat of legal action,” Tim Wolken, the county’s director of Community Services, said in an email.
The county “would appreciate reviewing any scientific data generated by the center indicating water quality concerns,” Wolken said in an email. “This will be helpful in determining next steps.”
Recreation enthusiasts are again left to wonder the fate of multi-use Trail 667, also known as Cap’n Jacks.
The Colorado Motorcycle Trail Riders Association sent a statement to The Gazette criticizing the “incessant zeal” of the center.
“The long, thoughtful process that resulted in the rerouting of several popular trails in Jones Park represents a balance between preserving Bear Creek fish habitat and allowing reasonable recreational outdoor access for all users,” the statement read.
For years during the Forest Service’s analysis and reroute negotiations, motorists were barred from their closest singletrack to town. Now roaming the realigned Trail 667 on the north side of Kineo Mountain, they are “the crux” of the center’s concern, said the organization’s attorney, Margaret Townsend.
“If it was just a footpath or even potentially a mountain bike trail, it could have some impact, but not necessarily the same impact a motorcycle trail is likely to have,” she said in a phone call. “Of course we want folks enjoying the forest, and where the trail was going to be originally, that location wouldn’t have affected the greenback.”
Originally, 667 was to skirt Kineo Mountain’s south side. “What we wanted to do here was come clean,” Pikes Peak District ranger Oscar Martinez told interested parties at a meeting in August of 2016.
He said the Forest Service’s hired hands with Trails Unlimited had stalled on that slope, finding it too steep and rocky, as some onlookers had predicted, feeling ignored. The trail would have to go north, the Forest Service determined — resulting in an extra $50,000 on top of the $396,820 project cost, records show.
But records do not show how the move may or may not have impacted the trout, the Center for Biological Diversity claims. Its letter reads: “there is no readily available evidence indicating that the Forest (Service) has taken steps to ensure no jeopardy to the greenback from the current trail system.”
But to Allyn Kratz, president of the local chapter of Trout Unlimited, the evidence is “overwhelming,” and not in the favor of conservation.
He said he raised concerns about the trail before it was built, noticing at least eight “ravines” on the mountainside while hiking the flagged route — “ravines created by water,” Kratz said, “and the water obviously went to Bear Creek.”
He said he was told Trails Unlimited would address this. But he was unsatisfied in the end and remains so.
“I would love to see (Trail 667) closed,” Kratz said.
That would be widely unwelcome among user groups, including mountain bikers. They have, though, expressed dismay with the new trail beyond the perceived fun that was lost.
“We’ve got some concerns with upkeep; the trail’s not holding up the way it was sort of advertised,” said Cory Sutela, with Medicine Wheel Trail Advocates. “But it’s also pretty far from the creek.”
He’s no biologist, he said. “I’m a mechanical engineer, so I look at it technically, and it looks to me like sediment shouldn’t be able to get from the trail to the creek.”
Jim Bensberg, speaking for the Colorado Motorcycle Trail Riders Association, agreed. “Show me the facts,” he said.
Without action in 60 days, the Center for Biological Diversity said it intends to pursue litigation in U.S. District Court.
What We Believe
We are driven by our deep respect for our environment, and our passionate commitment to sustainable tourism and conservation. We believe in the right for everyone - from all backgrounds and cultures - to enjoy our natural world, and we believe that we must all do so responsibly. Learn More