Colorado moves toward Front Range rail study (copy)

Passenger rail service along Interstate 25 could benefit greatly from new federal spending bill.

The long-term vision to bring passenger rail to the Colorado Front Range got a bit more validation Thursday from Amtrak. 

Amtrak, the quasi-public national rail corporation, identified a new passenger rail line from Cheyenne to Pueblo in its 15-year plan to add more than 30 new routes and serve up to 160 new communities, depending on federal funding.

The map was released just as the presidential administration is rolling out a $2 trillion infrastructure spending bill that could provide $80 billion for rail projects. 

Amtrak spokesman Marc Magliari said the Front Range passenger rail project is well positioned to receive funding because the Colorado Department of Transportation, Amtrak's Southwest Chief and Front Range Passenger Rail Commission are already working on the rail line, which gives the project an advantage over others.  

A Front Range rail line would also help relieve congestion along Interstate 25, Magliari said. 

"A train would be a really good answer to what people face on I-25," he said. 

The rail line's inclusion on the Amtrak map is also reassuring to local leaders, including Colorado Springs Councilwoman Jill Gaebler, a member of the state's passenger rail commission. The map reflects in writing what Amtrak has told the commission, she said. 

"They share our belief that this rail line is very important," Gaebler said.

The federal money could be paired with state funding if a proposed new fee on gasoline passes the state legislature. The state could also form a new sales tax district to help fund the rail line, she said.  

Those potential funding sources could come together to help the passenger rail line, likely to cost billions of dollars, open in the next five to 10 years, Gaebler said. 

An alternative to I-25 is going to be needed even after the $419 million project adding a lane in either direction between Castle Rock and Monument is finished, she said. 

"No amount of added lanes is going to change the congestion issues," Gaebler said, although the new lanes could make the highway safer.

The state is also out of room to add additional lanes once the interstate expansion project known as "The Gap" is completed, she said.

Not everyone supports the rail line idea. The "newly minted money" would be better spent on roads designed to serve driverless cars and ridesharing services, said Jon Caldara, president of the right-leaning Independence Institute and a columnist for the Gazette and Colorado Politics. 

"We need to build infrastructure that is friendly to the way we commute in Colorado," he said.

If it gets built, the most likely alignment for the new passenger rail service would share the current freight lines owned by BNSF and Union Pacific, said Jim Souby, chairman of the state's passenger rail commission. 

The commission has been granted federal funds to generate computer models to understand whether passenger trains could share the existing rail lines and not interrupt freight service, he said. There are points where the rail lines share a single track and those choke points would have to be addressed, he said.

Union Pacific and BNSF already share rail lines with passenger trains in other parts of the country, Souby said. 

"This is not a mystery to them," he said. 

Representatives of both rail companies are members of the state commission, which has already established that support for a commuter line is widespread with 85% of those surveyed saying they support the project and 61% saying they would pay a sales tax to finance it, according to a poll of 600 people along the Front Range. 

Contact the writer at mary.shinn@gazette.com or (719) 429-9264.

Newsletters

Get OutThere

Signup today for free and be the first to get notified on new updates.

(7) comments

Mountain woman

I would love to see railroads covering the entire state! It would be a huge benefit the have people who want to ski in Aspen travel here by rail and not drive vehicles in Aspen. It would be a big help with our serious traffic problems! We have lots of free transportation to anywhere someone wants to go here. No need for cars!

Billy O'Dea

Recreation of passenger rail service between Cheyenne and southern Colorado makes a ton of sense. Yes, the I-25 enhancements simply will not be enough to safely and efficiently accommodate tomorrow's transportation needs.

Smart scheduling, strategically placed stations and close work with communities and other transit organizations will win the day.

Tomorrow will likely bring user fees for automobile drivers, as gas taxes will decline and yet revenue will still need to be generated. Rail service provides a safe, environmentally sensitive approach.

Let's do more than study. Let's build while the capital is available!

Don't gold plate, just a basic foundation is all that is necessary to get service started.

Not-Logical

Yea! More rail lines that no one rides! And yes!, let's put AmTrak in charge of its operation, the rail line that would go bankrupt if it weren't for government subsidies! I'm sure thousands would take advantage of the Pueblo to Cheyenne route! Imagine the commute if we could get those drivers off of I-25! All this and more for a mere $2,000,000,000,000!

How much of the "Covid Relief Bill" went to covid relief? Only 9% (or less) went to public health measures. That left 1,729,000,000,000 for what? Mow, how much money that we don't have will actually go to fixing roads and bridges?

I've tried to warn people all my life about the national debt but it doesn't seem to matter. At this point, I give up. Go ahead and print money from nothing and borrow money from China. I'll be dead when it comes time to pay the fiddler. You folks go on and stimulate an economy that has it's hands tied.

A democracy will fail when the majority figures out it can vote itself money out of the public treasury. Paraphrased from Tytler, 200 years ago. This is why they don't want you knowing our history or any other's history.

Good luck.

leigh22

I concur with you on knowing history, our government's profligate spending, the national debt, and the nightmare of China....But I would like to see the train transportation flourish with the right engineering of rail lines.I 25 has been a nightmare for years and i believe people would opt for the train. You might see it as a roll of the dice, but I'd much rather chance the rails than see illegal aliens continue to gut us financially or struggle with a white knuckled I-25.

BluNos

BINGO! Folks we have a winner. Oh, by the way, what ever happened to the light rail service between Longmont/Boulder to Denver that the previous raise to the gas tax was supposed to pay for?

BluNos

I almost forgot Not-Logical, "Those who do not study history are doomed to repeat it."

Sojourner

What a horrid idea!! Spending the billions of dollars for a rail line too far to the East to truly help ease congestion is an incredibly bad idea. Much better to widen I-25 to four lanes each way, but that doesn't fit the current group's plans. Let's start thinking people! Stop bureaucratic squandering of our dollars!

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.